In federal contracting, past performance is one of the most influential evaluation factors. Agencies rely on it to assess whether a contractor can deliver on what they propose. However, simply listing completed projects is not enough. Effective past performance positioning requires strategically presenting experience to strengthen credibility, highlight relevance, and
Pricing in federal proposals is never just about numbers. While the cost volume contains spreadsheets, labor rates, and indirect pools, agencies want to understand the logic behind the price. That understanding is delivered through the pricing narrative — a written justification that explains how the proposed cost supports the technical
Building a strong technical or management proposal is only half the battle in federal contracting. Pricing is often the final determinant in award decisions, making proposal cost estimation a critical component of any winning bid. Agencies expect pricing to be fair, realistic, and aligned with the proposed solution. Without a
Even after submitting a strong written proposal, many federal contractors face one final challenge before award: the bid defense. Agencies may require oral presentations, Q&A sessions, or clarification meetings to validate a contractor’s approach. Winning at this stage requires strategic bid defense preparation, alignment with customer priorities, and readiness to
Federal proposals go through multiple stages of development and review before submission. Among these stages, the Red Team review is one of the most important. It simulates how evaluators will assess the proposal, applying criteria aligned with Section M of the solicitation. By following structured red team scoring criteria, contractors
Federal proposals are high-stakes documents where compliance and quality determine success. While color team reviews provide checkpoints throughout the development process, the Pink Team review is often the first structured evaluation of proposal drafts. Conducted early in the process, it allows teams to identify compliance gaps, refine messaging, and align
Federal proposals are complex documents with strict compliance requirements and competitive scoring environments. Attempting to create a “final draft” in one step is both unrealistic and risky. Instead, successful contractors rely on iterative proposal drafting—a process that builds proposals through multiple cycles of writing, review, and refinement. This approach ensures
Federal proposals require contributions from capture managers, subject matter experts (SMEs), writers, reviewers, and production staff. Increasingly, these contributors are spread across locations and time zones. Traditional in-person processes are no longer feasible. Remote proposal collaboration provides the structure and tools to align distributed teams, manage compliance, and deliver strong,
Federal proposal development is rarely confined to one office. Capture managers, writers, subject matter experts (SMEs), and reviewers are often spread across locations—and sometimes time zones. This makes virtual collaboration not just an option, but a necessity. Virtual proposal team management provides the structure, tools, and workflows needed to keep
Federal proposal development is a team sport. Dozens of contributors—from capture managers and SMEs to proposal writers and reviewers—must work together under strict deadlines to produce compliant, persuasive submissions. Without structure, proposals can quickly fall apart: deadlines slip, compliance issues appear, and content becomes inconsistent. Proposal coordination workflows give teams
Hinz Consulting is a proposal, capture, and business development consulting firm. We help customers, including Fortune 100 clients, win Government contracts in every market.
